Sunday, September 2, 2012

On sale King Lear (Arden Shakespeare: Third Series)


Are you looking for cheap King Lear (Arden Shakespeare: Third Series),
Amazon.com is offer King Lear (Arden Shakespeare: Third Series) cheap and best price for King Lear (Arden Shakespeare: Third Series).




Average Review Rank : Review score 4.1 of 5
List Price : $17.00
Price on September 3, 2012 : $9.88
Click here to check last price for King Lear (Arden Shakespeare: Third Series).
review shakespeare in oxford


    Amazon.com
    Customer Reviews
    Average Customer Review
    35 Reviews
    5 star:  (20)
    4 star:  (8)
    3 star:    (0)
    2 star:  (3)
    1 star:  (4)
     
     
     

    5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
    5.0 out of 5 stars Conflation fights back, April 20, 2010
    Jon Chambers (Birmingham, England) - See all my reviews
    (REAL NAME)   
    This review is from: King Lear (Arden Shakespeare: Third Series) (Paperback)
    Although RA Foakes' Arden3 edition appeared some years after those of Wells & Taylor (Complete Oxford) and Jay L Halio (Cambridge) it did not follow their precedent of issuing separate texts based on Quarto and Folio originals. These early texts (Q 1608 and F 1623 respectively) occasionally offer quite different versions of the play and reconciling them to form a single, coherent whole is a task that is, arguably, less elegant than the dual edition solution. By comparison, Arden's text looks cumbersome, with numerous Q and F superscripts surrounding passages found exclusively in one or other source.

    Foakes is well aware that his single, 'conflated' text isn't as fashionable as those of the 'revisionists' mentioned above, who believe that the Folio text of Lear represents Shakespeare's revised and final draft, and that modern editors should not pick and mix between Q and F but respect the integrity of the two early sources. While seemingly reactionary, Foakes is in fact... Read more
    Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
    Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


    15 of 19 people found the following review helpful
    5.0 out of 5 stars My humble King lear review - with a great deal of influence from Cavell., December 21, 2005
    Cromulus "Magnus Cromulus" (Rome) - See all my reviews
    This review is from: King Lear (Arden Shakespeare: Third Series) (Paperback)
    The Arden edition of King Lear (I believe this one is in its third printing) is a combination of both the Quarto and the Folio editions of the play. Of course, when you end up with a conflated edition (one that is made up of both) you are left at the mercy of the editor but, for my money, R.A. Foakes does an excellent job of integrating the manuscripts and often points out in the notes which and why certain choices were made.

    Other people have summarized the plot of King Lear here at amazon.com so I won't engage in that sort of review. I will concentrate instead on the particular edition and why I think it's among the best and then I will point out some things to look for in the play, things that I believe deserve close attention, things that will add to your enjoyment of the play.

    First of all the Arden edition - the book is basically divided into two major parts: the essays and the play. The play occupies the top half of each page, while the editorial notes and... Read more
    Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
    Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


    11 of 14 people found the following review helpful
    4.0 out of 5 stars Five stars for the play, October 18, 2003
    Joost Daalder "Joost Daalder" (South Australia) - See all my reviews
    (REAL NAME)   
    This review is from: King Lear (Arden Shakespeare: Third Series) (Paperback)
    The rating of four stars is for the edition (R.A. Foakes's); the play is one of the greatest tragedies ever written, and of course deserves at least five stars.

    It is not easy to find a a truly satisfactory edition of this play. An advantage of R.A. Foakes's is that he offers us a "conflated" text, i.e. one that aims to reconstruct something like what Shakespeare originally wrote by taking elements from the best two early printings rather than giving us those separately or by settling for the one rather than the other. I don't think, though, that Foakes's reconstruction is nearly as convincing as that of earlier editors who presented conflated texts. I am often unhappy about his glosses, too, and about his rather "trendy" introduction. Even so, the introduction and the notes do give us most of what we need, so long as we approach this material with independence of mind.

    The PLAY is the thing, and whichever text we read it in (even, for example, in a text based... Read more

    Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
    Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


    Share your thoughts with other customers:
     See all 35 customer reviews...

    *** Terms and Disclaimer *** CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME.
    This site is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com, endless.com, myhabit.com, smallparts.com, or amazonwireless.com. Some content that appears on this site come from AMAZON Services LLC This content is provided 'as' and are subject to change or remove it at any time.

    No comments:

    Post a Comment