Are you looking for on sale Shakespeare and Literary Theory (Oxford Shakespeare Topics),
Amazon.com is selling Shakespeare and Literary Theory (Oxford Shakespeare Topics) cheap and best offers for Shakespeare and Literary Theory (Oxford Shakespeare Topics).
Product Description
OXFORD SHAKESPEARE TOPICS
General Editors: Peter Holland and Stanley Wells
Oxford Shakespeare Topics provide students and teachers with short books on important aspects of Shakespeare criticism and scholarship. Each book is written by an authority in its field, and combines accessible style with original discussion of its subject.
How is it that the British literary critic Terry Eagleton can say that 'it is difficult to read Shakespeare without feeling that he was almost certainly familiar with the writings of Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Wittgenstein and Derrida', or that the Slovenian psychoanalytic theorist Slavoj %Zi%zek can observe that 'Shakespeare without doubt had read Lacan'? Shakespeare and Literary Theory argues that literary theory is less an external set of ideas anachronistically imposed on
Shakespeare's texts than a mode - or several modes - of critical reflection inspired by, and emerging from, his writing. These modes together constitute what we might call 'Shakespearian theory': theory that is not just about Shakespeare but also derives its energy from Shakespeare. To name just a few examples:
Karl Marx was an avid reader of Shakespeare and used Timon of Athens to illustrate aspects of his economic theory; psychoanalytic theorists from Sigmund Freud to Jacques Lacan have explained some of their most axiomatic positions with reference to Hamlet; Michel Foucault's early theoretical writing on dreams and madness returns repeatedly to Macbeth; Jacques Derrida's deconstructive philosophy is articulated in dialogue with Shakespeare's plays, including Romeo
and Juliet; French feminism's best-known essay is H--eacute--;l--egrave--;ne Cixous's meditation on Antony and Cleopatra; certain strands of queer theory derive their impetus from Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick's reading of the Sonnets; Gilles Deleuze alights on Richard III as an exemplary instance of his theory of the war machine; and postcolonial theory owes
a large debt to Aim--eacute--; C--eacute--;saire's revision of The Tempest. By reading what theoretical movements from formalism and structuralism to cultural materialism and actor-network theory have had to say about and in concert with Shakespeare, we can begin to get a sense of how much the DNA of contemporary literary theory contains a startling abundance of chromosomes - concepts, preoccupations, ways of using language - that are of Shakespearian provenance.
Product Description
OXFORD SHAKESPEARE TOPICS
General Editors: Peter Holland and Stanley Wells
Oxford Shakespeare Topics provide students and teachers with short books on important aspects of Shakespeare criticism and scholarship. Each book is written by an authority in its field, and combines accessible style with original discussion of its subject.
How is it that the British literary critic Terry Eagleton can say that 'it is difficult to read Shakespeare without feeling that he was almost certainly familiar with the writings of Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Wittgenstein and Derrida', or that the Slovenian psychoanalytic theorist Slavoj %Zi%zek can observe that 'Shakespeare without doubt had read Lacan'? Shakespeare and Literary Theory argues that literary theory is less an external set of ideas anachronistically imposed on
Shakespeare's texts than a mode - or several modes - of critical reflection inspired by, and emerging from, his writing. These modes together constitute what we might call 'Shakespearian theory': theory that is not just about Shakespeare but also derives its energy from Shakespeare. To name just a few examples:
Karl Marx was an avid reader of Shakespeare and used Timon of Athens to illustrate aspects of his economic theory; psychoanalytic theorists from Sigmund Freud to Jacques Lacan have explained some of their most axiomatic positions with reference to Hamlet; Michel Foucault's early theoretical writing on dreams and madness returns repeatedly to Macbeth; Jacques Derrida's deconstructive philosophy is articulated in dialogue with Shakespeare's plays, including Romeo
and Juliet; French feminism's best-known essay is H--eacute--;l--egrave--;ne Cixous's meditation on Antony and Cleopatra; certain strands of queer theory derive their impetus from Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick's reading of the Sonnets; Gilles Deleuze alights on Richard III as an exemplary instance of his theory of the war machine; and postcolonial theory owes
a large debt to Aim--eacute--; C--eacute--;saire's revision of The Tempest. By reading what theoretical movements from formalism and structuralism to cultural materialism and actor-network theory have had to say about and in concert with Shakespeare, we can begin to get a sense of how much the DNA of contemporary literary theory contains a startling abundance of chromosomes - concepts, preoccupations, ways of using language - that are of Shakespearian provenance.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful Cerebrally challenging, This review is from: Shakespeare and Literary Theory (Oxford Shakespeare Topics) (Paperback) There must be a lot of people out there - even some prominent Shakespeare scholars - with suspicions about the value of applying modern literary theories to works of the English Renaissance. At times, it is difficult to resist such suspicion or to see exactly whose ingenuity we are supposed to be appreciating - Shakespeare's or the critic's. Jonathan Gil Harris addresses such concerns head on: 'to what extent', he asks, 'do the desires of the reader ... produce the meaning attributed to the text?' But in Shakespeare and Literary Theory he is a very persuasive advocate of back-projecting modern critical theory onto Shakespeare. Especially so, he argues, given that Shakespeare's work often anticipates modern critical preoccupations - with language and identity, for instance.The book is no light, bed-time read. It requires concentration and stamina to engage with what are often challenging ideas. If Gil Harris himself occasionally finds Lacan 'extraordinarily difficult', for... Read more 0 of 2 people found the following review helpful Celebrities on Shakespeare, David Auerbach "waggish org" (new york) - See all my reviews This review is from: Shakespeare and Literary Theory (Oxford Shakespeare Topics) (Paperback) Harris conveniently states the problem with this short, well-written book in the introduction: "This book examines the most influential movements incontemporary literary theory and how its leading practitioners have engaged Shakespeare." Why is this a problem? Because the "leading practitioners" often knew very little about Shakespeare. Sigmund Freud thought Shakespeare wasn't Shakespeare, but the Earl of Oxford, a view that would get him tossed out of the academy today. But because he's Freud, we hear more about his daffy psychoanalytical interpretations than we do about the much more careful and insightful applications of Freudian theory to Shakespeare by Stanley Cavell (Disowning Knowledge: In Seven Plays of Shakespeare) and Janet Adelman... Read more |
› See both customer reviews...
*** Terms and Disclaimer *** CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME.
This site is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com, endless.com, myhabit.com, smallparts.com, or amazonwireless.com. Some content that appears on this site come from AMAZON Services LLC This content is provided 'as' and are subject to change or remove it at any time.
scrapbooking companies neutrogena pads
No comments:
Post a Comment